The Evolution of Safety Leadership
For decades, Occupational Health, Safety, and Environment (OHSE) was often viewed by the C-Suite—the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Operating Officer (COO), and other senior executives—as a necessary evil, a cost center managed by dedicated specialists whose primary job was regulatory compliance. The focus was simple: pass the audit, minimize the fine, and react to incidents. Safety was treated as a tactical function, divorced from the core strategic goals of revenue and market growth.
This paradigm is failing. In today’s complex, globalized, and rapidly changing work environment, safety is no longer a peripheral task; it is a foundational element of organizational resilience, reputation, and operational excellence. World-class OHSE experts have known this for years, building successful programs based on behavioral science, psychological safety, and leadership visibility.
The time has come for the C-Suite to stop delegating safety culture and start embodying it. True safety leadership requires a fundamental shift in mindset and a deep adoption of the principles championed by OHSE professionals. This article outlines five essential habits the C-Suite must adopt to transform their organizations from merely compliant entities into truly safe, high-performing enterprises.
Check out SNATIKA’s premium D.OHSEM from Barcelona Technology School, Spain and MSc in OHSEM from ENAE Business School, Spain before you go!
II. Habit 1: Shift from Compliance Checkbox to Moral Imperative
The most critical difference between an OHSE professional and an executive focused solely on quarterly results is the lens through which they view risk. An OHSE expert fundamentally sees safety as a moral imperative—an unconditional duty to protect every worker. The compliant C-Suite sees safety as a regulatory obligation—a series of boxes to check to avoid penalties.
Leadership must internalize that every decision, from supply chain selection to capital expenditure, is a safety decision. When the CEO treats safety as a core value—as non-negotiable as financial integrity—that value cascades through the organization. This shift transforms safety from a fear of penalty (extrinsic motivation) to a source of pride and purpose (intrinsic motivation). When leadership champions this moral duty, it creates a “just culture,” where workers are encouraged to report failures without fear of retribution, accelerating learning and prevention.
True safety leaders understand that the human cost is immeasurable, but the financial cost of neglect is staggering, challenging the notion that safety is merely an expense.
The Financial and Human Cost of Compliance Failure
When safety is viewed only through the prism of compliance, the organization misses the true magnitude of its failure. The costs associated with fatalities, serious injuries, and long-term occupational diseases—including indirect costs like loss of talent, damaged reputation, litigation, and decreased morale—far outweigh the cost of robust preventative systems.
The estimated global cost of poor or non-existing safety and health measures has been estimated to be around 3 trillion USD, equivalent to 3.9% of the global GDP.
This overwhelming financial figure is a direct result of collective compliance failure across the world. For any single corporation, even a fraction of this financial burden—which is essentially wealth and productivity lost—justifies treating safety as a strategic investment. The C-Suite must recognize that the moral argument is the business argument, making the safeguarding of life and limb the company's highest priority.
III. Habit 2: Lead with Visibility, Authenticity, and Vulnerability
OHSE experts often speak of "safety visible leadership" (SVL). This means more than wearing a hard hat for a photo opportunity; it means actively engaging in safety dialogue, observing work, and being authentically present. The C-Suite must move from talking about safety in boardrooms to being seen leading it on the front lines.
Walking the Talk: Beyond the Boardroom
Executive visibility is a potent cultural driver. When a CEO dedicates time to safety walks, engages in non-punitive safety conversations with frontline staff, and asks open-ended questions about hazards, it sends an unequivocal message: We value your safety more than our production schedule. This is a habit of intentional scheduling and deep, active listening.
However, modern safety leadership requires more than just visibility; it requires vulnerability. The C-Suite needs to adopt the habit of acknowledging when the system has failed the worker, rather than blaming the worker for the system’s failure. This involves openly discussing past organizational mistakes in OHS incidents and demonstrating a genuine commitment to learning from them. When a senior leader admits, "We did not provide the right training or equipment for that job," it builds immense trust.
Building Trust for Retention and Productivity
A visible, authentic leader creates a workplace with high psychological safety. Workers feel confident that they can raise concerns without fear of reprisal, leading to proactive identification of hazards. This trust is crucial for business performance.
A visible, trust-based safety culture is not just about avoiding incidents; it is strongly linked to overall business performance. Studies show that improving safety, health, and working conditions through effective policies has been linked to increased productivity, improved staff retention, and minimized tension and conflict within the organization.
The C-Suite's visibility is the ultimate mechanism for reducing turnover and improving operational efficiency, cementing safety as a competitive advantage.
IV. Habit 3: Embrace Prevention-Focused Metrics: The Shift to Leading Indicators
A core principle of OHSE expertise is the distinction between Lagging Indicators and Leading Indicators. Unfortunately, many C-Suites remain obsessed with lagging indicators—like Lost Time Injury (LTI) rates or Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR)—which measure failure after it has occurred. This is akin to driving a car by only looking in the rearview mirror.
OHSE professionals focus relentlessly on Leading Indicators, which measure preventative actions taken to predict and stop failure before it happens. Examples include the quality and quantity of safety observations, near-miss reporting rates, employee participation in risk assessments, and proactive hazard correction completion rates.
The Problem with Lagging Indicators
Focusing on low LTI rates often creates a culture of under-reporting, where minor incidents are hidden to maintain a positive "zero incidents" facade. The C-Suite needs to adopt the habit of celebrating high near-miss reporting rates, as this indicates a healthy, open culture that is actively identifying and managing risk.
Measuring Prevention, Not Failure
The C-Suite must learn to ask OHSE teams: "What are we doing today to prevent tomorrow's incidents?" rather than just "How many people were hurt last month?" This habit requires changing the metrics presented in the board meeting from mere incident counts to robust data on preventative activities and their closure rates. A high number of safety observations should be seen as a strength, not a weakness.
Despite decades of safety regulation, the burden of work-related diseases and injuries continues to grow in crucial areas. For instance, the burden of work-related diseases and injuries increased by 26% from 2.3 million annual deaths in 2014 to 2.9 million in 2019, despite successful reductions in high-income regions.
This trend demonstrates that reactive, lagging-indicator-based systems are incapable of addressing complex, long-latency occupational health issues. The C-Suite must embrace leading indicators to preemptively manage systemic risks that take years to manifest.
V. Habit 4: Integrate Safety into Business Strategy and Capital Allocation
For too long, safety was an operational expense, a line item cut during lean times. OHSE experts, however, know that safety is intrinsically linked to operational efficiency, equipment lifespan, and project success. The C-Suite needs to adopt the habit of embedding OHS criteria into every major business decision, from mergers and acquisitions to budget cycles.
Safety as a Strategic Imperative
This habit involves treating safety investment not as consumption, but as a value driver. For example:
- Capital Expenditure (CapEx): When purchasing new machinery, the safest option should be given a higher priority score than the cheapest option, recognizing the long-term lifecycle savings from reduced downtime and injury claims.
- Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A): OHS performance and culture should be a critical due diligence component. Acquiring a company with a poor safety record is acquiring immense liability and operational inefficiency.
- Performance Reviews: Safety leadership should be a weighted component in the performance evaluations of all managers, not just those in the OHSE department.
When executives see safety as a strategic enabler—a key component of resilience and shareholder value—they stop treating it as an afterthought.
Quantifying the Strategic Value
When the C-Suite adopts this habit, they begin to understand that safety failure represents a drag on national and corporate economic performance. The impact is measurable and directly affects the profitability and viability of the enterprise.
In a high-income country like Australia, where OHS standards are relatively high, analyses show that if all work-related injuries and illnesses were removed, the country’s GDP would have been around 1.6 per cent higher each year on average.
This statistic provides irrefutable evidence that failure to achieve full safety potential is a constant, quantifiable drag on economic performance. The C-Suite, responsible for maximizing shareholder return and organizational efficiency, cannot afford to ignore a factor that directly impacts productivity by 1-2% or more. Safety excellence is operational excellence.
VI. Habit 5: Empower Frontline Workers as Risk Experts (Safety as Dialogue)
OHSE experts universally agree: the people who do the work are the experts in the risk. The C-Suite’s final and most transformative habit must be moving away from a command-and-control, top-down safety structure to one of radical empowerment and open dialogue. Safety should be treated as an organizational learning process, not an enforcement mandate.
This means consistently seeking out and acting upon the ground-level knowledge of frontline workers. They know which procedures are unworkable, which equipment is failing, and where the latent organizational weaknesses lie.
Decentralizing Authority: The Stop Work Mandate
The ultimate expression of this empowerment is the Stop Work Authority (SWA)—giving every single employee, regardless of rank or tenure, the non-negotiable right to stop any task they deem unsafe, without fear of punishment. This habit requires the C-Suite to not only endorse SWA but to publicly and repeatedly reward those who exercise it, especially when it results in temporary production delays.
This empowerment is particularly relevant in the context of the vast, unprotected global workforce. While many C-Suites oversee formal organizations, they operate in an environment where basic worker rights and protections are often absent for the majority of global labor.
Globally, 58.0% of those employed were in informal employment in 2022, amounting to around 2 billion workers. This vast population often lacks formal OHS protections, including the basic right to worker representation and safety dialogue.
For the C-Suite, championing worker empowerment—through consultative committees, formal training, and SWA—is an ethical mandate that ensures their own formal workforce has the necessary protections and voice that so many global workers lack. It models the ideal OHS structure needed for all work, formal and informal.
The Psychological Safety Loop
The empowerment habit creates psychological safety, the foundation of a successful learning organization. If a worker doesn't feel safe raising a hand, the organization is blind to its true risks. The C-Suite must make it safe to fail small—to report a near-miss or a slight deviation—to prevent the catastrophic, big failure.
VII. Conclusion: The Transformational Power of Safety Leadership
The shift from compliance-driven management to authentic safety leadership is the ultimate challenge for the modern C-Suite. It is not a temporary initiative but a fundamental, permanent change in operational philosophy. By adopting the five habits distilled from decades of OHSE expertise—committing to a moral imperative, leading visibly and vulnerably, focusing on preventative metrics, integrating safety into core strategy, and radically empowering frontline workers—executives stop seeing safety as a department and start seeing it as the defining characteristic of a resilient, high-performing, and sustainable enterprise.
The C-Suite holds the power to save lives, drive productivity, and secure their company's legacy. By embracing these habits, they move from being mere overseers of compliance to genuine guardians of the workforce, transforming their organization in the process.
Check out SNATIKA’s premium D.OHSEM from Barcelona Technology School, Spain and MSc in OHSEM from ENAE Business School, Spain before you go!